“Beware of false knowledge. It is more dangerous than ignorance.” --George Bernard Shaw
“Beware of false knowledge. It is more dangerous than ignorance.” --George Bernard Shaw
The truth is sacred. Writing for lewrockwell.com, philosophy teacher Andrew Durant wisely points out that to treat the sacred as a mere option is deadly. How does one make truth seem like just an option? By simply tossing it into the pool of public opinion with all the false information out there.
Freedom and truth complement each other; freedom allows the truth to be known and truth enables us to be free. We, the people, are on our own when it comes to finding the truth and getting it out there because we're getting little if any help from mainstream media. In fact, they ar working against us with their globalist agendas that not only don't work but also belittle our freedom. We have to put together our own investigative reports. We can't depend on anyone to do it for us.
Investigating the Vaccines
John Iacovino, a commenter on Facebook who seems to have been censored, was sharing a plethora of valuable information about the COVID vaccines. Back in February, in a comments section somewhere in the internet wilderness, he said COVID vaccination is only designed to stop mild symptoms, backing up his claim with multiple sources.
With the risks of the COVID vaccine so undeniably grave, Iacovino said, you might think the benefits are large. Think again. Big Pharma has stated that the vaccine only protects against mild (not moderate or severe) symptoms, which makes the vaccine virtually pointless, given the large majority of people who allegedly have COVID have little or no symptoms whatsoever.
The study "Will Covid-19 vaccines save lives?", published in the BMJ (British Medical Journal) by Professor Peter Doshi, states that current trials aren’t designed to tell whether the vaccines will save lives. "That raises at least 2 very good points about the failure of the COVID vaccines to stop moderate/severe symptoms and to stop transmission," Iacovino states. Professor Doshi quotes, among others, Moderna chief medical officer Tal Zaks:
“But what will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared 'effective'?"
That is a good question. Especially when we're talking about a vaccine that wasn't needed in the first place, I don't think we can ever say it was effective. Perhaps Big Pharma will consider it effective once they make enough money off it, or--worse yet--substantially alter what it means to be human.
Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said, “Ideally, you want an antiviral vaccine to do two things . . . first, reduce the likelihood you will get severely ill and go to the hospital, and two, prevent infection and therefore interrupt disease transmission.”
"Yet the current phase III trials are not actually set up to prove either," Hotez added. "None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.”
“Zaks ... told The BMJ that the company’s trial lacks adequate statistical power to assess those outcomes. 'The trial is precluded from judging [hospital admissions], based on what is a reasonable size and duration to serve the public good here,' he said. Hospital admissions and deaths from COVID-19 are simply too uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30,000 people. The same is true of its ability to save lives or prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out."
Zaks continued, “Would I like to know that this prevents mortality? Sure, because I believe it does. I just don’t think it’s feasible within the timeframe [of the trial]—too many would die waiting for the results before we ever knew that.”
Iacovino asks, "What about Hotez’s second criterion, interrupting virus transmission, which some experts have argued should be the most important test in phase III studies?"
“Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission,” Zaks said, “because in order to do that you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable.”
Experimental COVID Vaccines Not Designed to Stop Transmission
"Likewise, Big Pharma admitted they didn’t design the vaccine to stop transmission," Iacovino added. "Therefore, if someone else gets the vaccine, it doesn’t stop them from transmitting the virus to you, and if you get the vaccine, it does not stop you from transmitting the virus to others. This may be why Dr. Anthony Fauci continued to push the dehumanizing agenda when he stated on MSM TV that people should still socially distance and wear masks even after getting vaccinated:
“Obviously, with a 90+% effective vaccine, you could feel much more confident [about not getting sick] … but I would recommend to people to not abandon all public health measures just because you have been vaccinated,” Fauci said.
It sounds like a zero-sum game then. Why bother getting the vaccine? It sounds like Fauci and the makers of the vaccines want to have their cake and eat it too. They want people to take the vaccine, so they say it's 90 percent effective. But they don't want to be blamed when it doesn't work. So they strongly recommend keeping up the draconian public health measures. Could it be that the vaccines were inneffective in stopping the virus to begin with, if there ever was a real virus dangerous enough to lockdown the whole world?
No Real Isolated Virus Was Used to Make the Vaccine
"The vaccine cannot possibly be truly effective since it was not based on an actual isolated sample of the SARS-CoV-2 virus," Iacovino continued. "The WHO protocols that Pfizer used to produce the mRNA do not appear to identify any nucleotide sequences that are unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. I have been covering this point ever since the COVID scamdemic began," he said, referring in part to the article, "SARS-CoV-2: The Stitched Together, Frankenstein Virus", which highlights that COVID, or SARS-CoV-2, is a theoretical digital virus, constructed from a computer database, that does not exist in the real world. Fran Leader questioned the UK MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) about this, asserting that the ‘virus’ was actually a computer-generated genomic sequence, and ultimately they confirmed, “The DNA template does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person.”
Whether COVID is anything more than a computer-generated genomic sequence is yet to be determined. We do see new viruses emerge every year. It may just be that COVID-19 isn't as novel as mainstream media, doctors, and politicians say it is. It's interesting to hear what the UK MHRA had to say about it, though.
WHO Admits There’s No Evidence COVID Vax Works
Iacovino also shared that the World Health Organization chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan Yadav admitted that there is no “evidence on any of the [COVID] vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.”
Experimental COVID Vaccines Contain PEGylated Lipid Nanoparticles Which Can Cause Disease
Dr. Frank Shallenberger, a family doctor from Carson City, NV who has revolutionized the practice of anti-aging and preventive medicine, writes about the dangers of PEGylated lipid nanoparticles which are used to hide the mRNA from our bodies:
“The mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction. So, in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.”
Pfizer Vaccine Fallout
In the article, "From shots to clots: considerable medical evidence of COVID vaccine-induced blood clots", internationally known physician, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, said:
“The dangers of the COVID-19 vaccine spike protein and its interactions with the human immune system, conferring risks of clotting and leakage of blood vessels, are becoming increasingly well known” . . . The failure to monitor and assess these risks in the subsequent clinical trials, and the grossly negligent review process in conjunction with the emergency use authorizations, have predictably resulted in an unprecedented medical disaster” and “Calling off this failed experiment is long overdue. Continuing or even mandating the use of this poisonous vaccine, and the apparently imminent issuance of full approval for it are crimes against humanity.”
Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn, author of Pandemic Blunder and many articles on the pandemic, adds, "For most healthy, relatively young (less than age 70) people, the benefits of COVID vaccination do not outweigh the risks. Dr. McCullough was correct in saying that the better approach to COVID vaccination would have limited it to perhaps 20 million Americans with serious COVID risks.”
"An astonishing number of people have been hurt, damaged, injured and killed from the Pfizer COVID vax" Iacovino writes. "Take a look at the following headlines, data and links from our friends at For Our Rights." Here is a long list of sources from them pointing to the danger of the vaccines:
Wife of ‘perfectly healthy’ Miami doctor, 56, who died of a blood disorder 16 days after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is certain it was triggered by the jab, as drug giant investigates first death with a suspected link to shot
COVID vaccine side effects more common after 2nd dose (article removed)
One negative side-effect is too many for a vaccine that was never needed in the first place. One death is too many for a vaccine designed to fight a virus that has a 0.2 percent death rate and a 0.02 percent death rate for those who are under 70. One hospitalization is too many for a vaccine that is supposed to prevent a virus that could be treated with hydrocortisone, hydroxychloroquine, Remdesivir, budesonide, or Ivermectin.
Due to all the pandemonium regarding COVID-19, I think it's necessary to remind people of some basic truths:
The lockdowns didn't work.
People get sick and, sadly, sometimes people die.
Vaccine mandates, like the mask mandates, are designed to control people--not the virus.
As lovers of the free press, we need to separate the truth from the lies, and spread the truth unapologetically to show that false information stands no chance against real investigation. To that end, we have to network and unite those who see what we see. We need to form our own parallel society with doctors, lawyers, and professionals in every field. I've tried to do that. Professionals like the following have done the same:
Dr. Leland Stillman, MD, internal medicine specialist
Pamela Acker, biologist and author of Vaccination: A Catholic Perspective,
Brad Bergford, attorney at law, Bergoford Law Group.
And many, many more.
I gathered much of the info in this article in February. Some may say it's outdated and no longer relevant. I say we too easily forget. We've forgotten how many professionals, and how many news articles, warned us about the dangers of the vaccines at the very beginning when they were first being administered. Then the mainstream promotions came from Big Pharma, government officials and leaders, and the warnings were for the most part forgotten. How short has our collective memory become? HBO's ultra-progressive show Last Week Tonight tries to make a joke of how easily we throw away last week's news. It's no joke, though. The mainstream media have us on a string, making us forget yesterday's headlines so we can chase whatever new piece of news they dangle before us. I present the information in this article with hopes that we will have less ephemeral attention spans; so we can grasp the hermeneutic of the MSM's narrative and call their bluff. It's not that hard to do when you know the truth.
Disclaimer: I have tried to give adequate credit to all sources I’ve used, but because of the nature of the internet these days these sources are elusive. To whomever I am in debt for sharing the following information in the lost regions of the internet, I thank you. I honestly looked all over to try and contact you but couldn’t find you. In retrospect, I now notice you may have been censored, or wish to not be known, or both. So, dear commenter, you have my gratitude.
If anyone believes I am violating any copyrights or intellectual rights, please contact me at email@example.com.